home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- The following article is adapted from a piece by the
- editor of the Raleigh (NC) Amateur Radio Society's EXCITER.
- Permission is granted to copy for use in any Amateur Radio
- newsletter, provided proper credit is given.
-
- If used, please send a copy of your newsletter to:
-
- Vince Yakamavich, AA4MY
- 220 Carriage Trail
- Raleigh, NC 27614
-
- (I like to see what other papers look like -- I'll mail you
- one of mine in return!)
- ==========================================================
-
- NEWCOMER'S GUIDE TO AMATEUR RADIO EQUIPMENT
-
- I recently overheard two fairly new-to-the-hobby Amateurs
- discussing (bemoaning) the high cost of Amateur Radio gear,
- specifically HF transceivers. They were discussing top
- brands, and top-of the line models. (Sorta like two
- teenagers with newly-earned learner's permits, bemoaning the
- prohibitive costs surrounding Porsche 924's...) "You really
- can't get much for under $1,000," said they. "Horse-feathers!"
- sez I.
-
- Many new Amateurs mistakenly assume that they have no choice
- but to begin with a tired old used QRP CW transceiver, a wire
- dipole antenna, and perhaps a used handheld rig for VHF/UHF.
- This may be the case if you're simply flat broke and have no
- way to raise cash for a decent station, but there are many
- possibilities if you allow you creativity, determination, and
- logic to prevail. And you won't have to "homebrew" your entire
- station (unless you want to)!
-
- Over the past 10 years, there has been a virtual explosion in
- electronic technology. The technology of "yesterday" (tubes,
- and linear VFO's) have been replaced with ultra-sophisticated,
- computerized, marvels of engineering and packaging technology
- (for which, we pay most dearly). But let's look seriously at
- some of those "antiques" of the late 70's and early 80's (which
- are now in the $400 - $800 range). Did they work? Most
- assuredly. How well did they work? Many a DXCC and 5 band WAS
- earned, with untold millions of hours of enjoyment, to boot!
-
- Unfortunately, newcomers won't find ads for the "antiques"
- in today's Amateur Radio mags. All they see are the ads for the
- new, (multi) kilo-buck transceivers from Japan Inc.
-
- After reading some of the spec sheets on the new rigs, a
- newcomer to the hobby will probably think I'm off my rocker
- when I say most of the "features" found on the new HF rigs
- in the kilo-buck range are USELESS!
-
- Just for an example, lets talk about "digital VFO's" and
- "memories". A "digital VFO" is in actuality, a frequency
- synthesizer. Synthesizers are characterized by extreme
- frequency stability (a very desirable trait), on the order
- of 20 Hz or less per hour (based on thermal changes in the
- crystal time base). But let's look at some of those
- "antiques". They, too, can boast of frequency stability.
- Like 100 Hz or so per hour. "But," you say, "that's FIVE
- TIMES WORSE than what a new rig can do!" And you're
- absolutely correct. But the key question is: "Will you
- notice 100 Hz per hour drift?" Using a tight CW filter,
- yes, you would--after perhaps a FULL HOUR QSO. On SSB,
- you'd probably want to touch the frequency knob after about
- 2 HOURS of rag-chewing! Yes, those older rigs sure made
- Amateur Radio operating rough...
-
- "But the new rig offers 100 "memories", while some of the
- "antiques" don't even offer a digital display!" Yup, you're
- right again! But remember, unlike the VHF/UHF FM spectrum,
- HF is not "channelized". HF stations will be scattered
- randomly on the band--NEVER will you find them exactly
- where you programmed your memory for yesterday!. Net
- operation?? "Plus or Minus QRM" is often heard on many an HF
- net preamble. Your HF "memory" will NEVER get you exactly
- on the frequency of your favorite net. You'll always be
- tuning up and down the band anyway. Unless you plan to make
- heavy use of autostart RTTY, HF packet, or AMTOR, I doubt
- you'll ever need a memory on HF.
-
- Keyboard entry of frequency? Perhaps good to get you in the
- desired band segment, but not much more.
-
- Digital display? Impressive to look at, and perhaps nice to
- have. But crystal calibrators (about $20 to build, if your
- "antique" doesn't already have one built in) and mechanical
- displays have been the frequency reference for years--and
- yes, the new rigs' high-tech synthesizers have to be
- calibrated against WWV, just like the $20 calibrator...
-
- Solid state finals versus tubes. No doubt about it, tubes
- are getting more difficult to find. But they CAN be found.
- "Tubes are expensive!" Yes they are--but YOU can replace
- them. Ever try to get 4 matched RF type transistors? Ever
- changed a set mounted in a heat-sink buried within the bowels
- of a tightly packed maze where even Japanese-sized fingers fear
- to go? More likely than not, the average Amateur wouldn't even
- ATTEMPT to replace the finals in a solid state rig (IF he could
- find a matched replacement set!), while changing a tube presents
- little, if any, problem. Tubes have other advantages, too.
- They're infinitely more forgiving when it comes to that "ideal"
- 50 ohm resistive match we Amateurs are always seeking, but
- seldom attain. At 2:1 SWR, a tube will work just fine--a newer
- rig will probably go into a limited "foldback" to protect the
- transistors. Three to one?? Tubes are still perkin'
- along...Transistor? Forget it!
-
- One disadvantage though: You will have to learn to peak the
- grid, and dip the plate. Hand-eye coordination. Watch the
- meter--twist the knob. Yup, those "Amateurs of olden days" sure
- had it rough...
-
- Speech compressor? Some DXers swear by 'em. Most rag-chewers
- swear AT 'em! If you need one, they exist as after-market
- devices for the older rigs, not to mention the "build your own"
- method.
-
- Suffice to say, a lot of the features on the newer rigs
- amount to high priced, useless frills.
-
- What newcomers in quest of a good HF rig REALLY need to do is
- seek out an EXPERIENCED Amateur who has knowledge about the older
- rigs. Ask what kind of rig they use. Ask what they like or
- dislike about it. Most Amateurs are delighted to show off their
- shack, and give you hands-on exposure to their setups.
-
- I'd recommend any of the following, as they were the "standard
- of performance" in that "classic" age of 10 or more years ago.
- Most can be found in ham-fests or in trader publications for
- around $200 - $600. Collins KWM-2A, Drake TR4-C, & TR-7
- transceivers; Collins S Line, Drake T4C, R4C (separate Receiver &
- transmitter). Again, these were the "Cadillacs" of 10 or so
- years ago. Solid, proven performers, and parts still readily
- available.
-
- Be cautious though--not all the rigs in this era were gems.
- Although some of their rigs were winners, manufacturers such as
- SWAN, National, EICO, et al., have had models that left a sour
- taste in the Amateur community. Until you're more knowledgeable
- about the ins and outs of specific models, stick to the
- "Cadillacs" like Collins & Drake.
-
- Got a little more to spend? Icom 745 (my current HF rig),
- Kenwood TS-830, TS-430. $600 - $800 range. SOLID performers
- (even if they ARE transistorized!).
-
- Just for fun, let me play devil's advocate. Lets assume that
- you, Joe New Ham, just HAS to have that kilo-buck+ special. It's
- a steep price to pay, no argument. But the thing you have to
- keep in mind is that the cost of this hobby is mostly "up-front
- money." In the long run, Amateur Radio is NOT that expensive
- when you look at dollar cost versus hours of enjoyment.
-
- Let's compare it to some other hobbies: Bowling--pretty
- inexpensive, eh? After you buy your equipment (about $75 or so),
- you can look forward to dropping an additional $10 or so every
- time you visit the lanes for a couple hours of fun. A couple
- times a week, over the course of a SINGLE YEAR, you've already
- paid MORE than that new transceiver costs! Do you enjoy going to
- the movies? Add this up: $5-$6 admission, $2-$5 for refreshments,
- that's $7-$11 per film, and if you go just once a week it works out
- to $350-$550 per year...add a date and double it...about an hour and
- a half of entertainment each week for perhaps $1,000! And don't
- forget the hassles of parking, waiting in line, etc. What abou
- golf? You pay greens fees, and you're limited to daylight and (for
- all but the fanatics) fair weather. Not so with HF Amateur Radio.
- Twenty-four hours a day, rain or shine, you can sit down and
- enjoy your INVESTMENT, making new friends, learning about
- faraway places, and perhaps helping others in life-threatening
- situations.
-
- Compare your Amateur Radio hobby. Say you spend even $5,000 on a
- transceiver, antenna, tower, tuner, power supply, coaxial cables,
- rotator, and miscellaneous accessories for the shack. Let's say the
- setup lasts five years (conservatively) before you want to make any
- major changes. Five grand works out to $1,000 a year, or $20 a week
- for unlimited hours of operating and providing a valued public service.
- Even if you add more extras, like a good keyer, handheld VHF radios,
- club dues, magazine subscriptions, reference books, tools, license
- upgrade preparation tapes, packet TNCs, backup power generators,
- mobile gear, and a cheap computer, it's still a fairly inexpensive
- hobby over the long haul. No to mention the fact that you'll probably
- recoup 30-50% (or more) of your investment if you decide to sell your
- equipment used at a later date. So, for a net outlay equivalent to
- maybe $10-$25 a week, you can be a "compleat Amateur."
-
- If you're still doubtful about the hobby, seek out an
- experienced Amateur to consult and/or go shopping with, and go
- for one of the "classics" of recent time. Get on the air. It
- won't take you long to become hooked on HF operating. It's day
- and night compared to VHF repeater operation. Besides, you'll
- always be able to sell it at a hamfest if you ever lose interest.
- But if you're convinced that Amateur Radio is for YOU, then go
- ahead and look at those kilo-buck+ specials, visit your friendly
- Credit Union if necessary, and GO FOR IT!
-
-
- 73 de Vince Yakamavich, AA4MY
-